Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology – Artifex.News https://artifexnews.net Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 https://artifexnews.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/cropped-Artifex-Round-32x32.png Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology – Artifex.News https://artifexnews.net 32 32 Unravelling the links between consanguinity and genetic diseases https://artifexnews.net/article67395655-ece/ Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:00:00 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article67395655-ece/ Read More “Unravelling the links between consanguinity and genetic diseases” »

]]>

In the rich tapestry of human ancestry and history, there is one genomic thread that weaves a particularly complex narrative. It connects our lineage through the many generations across our existence on the earth, and also defines our genetic vulnerabilities. This thread is none other than consanguinity: the practice of marrying close relatives, an age-old tradition that is still practised widely in several human societies worldwide.

According to one estimate, approximately 15-20% of the world’s population practises inbreeding, especially in Asia and West Africa.

Consanguinity has both shaped our cultural landscapes and left an indelible mark on our genetic destiny. It is a social as well as genetic construct. In the social context, it means marriage between individuals related by blood; in the genetic context, it means marriage between genetically related individuals, otherwise called inbreeding.

Using modern genomic tools, scientists can quantify the relatedness between two individuals as a percentage of the genetic material shared between them (identity by state) or by the genetic material in stretches of a chromosome that are identical to each other and are inherited from parents (identity by descent).

The misfortunes of royal marriages

There is evidence to suggest that ancient human civilisations, like those of the Egyptians and Incas, among others, could have practised inbreeding or consanguinity. In particular, a body of historical and genetic evidence suggests that King Tutankhamun of Egypt was born to parents who were blood relatives.

We are still understanding the genetic and population effects of these practices. So it isn’t surprising that many key insights that are biomedically relevant – including discovery of new genes and genetic correlates – have been unearthed by looking through the lens of consanguinity. Many genetic concepts were found by studying the intricate tapestry of royal marriages in Europe and the diseases the individuals have. But since the democratisation of genetics and genomics, scientists have been able to study the general population in the same way, on a larger scale.

Scientists have extensively studied the level of inbreeding in various populations around the world. Some of the most well-studied populations in this regard include the Ashkenazi Jews and the Amish. With more than 4,000 endogamous groups – i.e. people marrying within the same caste/tribe or group – India has been a fertile ground for consanguinity.

Researchers at the CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, in Hyderabad, have also identified several endogamous populations in India with very high levels of geneticrelatedness, and have identified many populations in India with a very high level of inbreeding – some more so than the Ashkenazi Jews.

Studies have found that a significant fraction of the global population practises consanguinity and that that has increased the mortality and the rate of recessive genetic diseases in these peoples.

Benefits of consanguinity

While consanguinity is undesirable among humans, scientists widely wield the principle of mating between related offspring to breed plants and animals. With such efforts in experimental settings, they have been able to eliminate deleterious genetic alleles in populations. (Alleles are different versions of the same gene.)

Taking cues from these efforts, it is possible to anticipate evolutionary ‘bottleneck’ events in the past that could have resulted, similarly, in the removal of deleterious alleles from humans.

There is some evidence suggesting that ancient populations in which bottlenecks restricted mating choices would have resulted in consanguinity. In turn, such evolutionary or natural bottleneck events and consanguinity could have provided a chance to eliminate deleterious alleles while outbreeding would have created opportunities for heterozygotes (individuals with two alleles for a gene) with advantageous traits.

This said, precisely how such inbreeding and bottlenecks have contributed to human traits and diseases remains an open question.

Molecular measures of inbreeding, consanguinity

We inherit one copy of each chromosome from our parents. When the gametes – i.e. the reproductive cells – form, the chromosomes recombine. That is, genetic information, as blocks of genomic regions in the chromosomes, are exchanged.

In an event when the parents are related to each other, there is a chance that there will be identical blocks of genetic information in both chromosomes. These blocks are called ‘runs of homozygosity’, and the subsequent exchange is said to be autozygous.

The percentage of autozygosity in an individual’s genome thus creates a unique way to understand the genetic history of the population: in terms of sexual unions between related individuals over many generations. Other measures have also been developed to measure the stretches of chromosomes that are identical to each other. This is in part due to the genome-scale data now available to scientists, with which they can estimate the kinship between any two individuals.

Consanguinity and disease

Many modern consanguineous societies, like the Amish population in the U.S., have been studied for recessive diseases. In fact, scientists have extensively used autozygosity as an approach to identify new genetic diseases in populations where consanguineous marriage practices is the norm.

The results of these studies have helped us uncover previously unknown genetic diseases as well as estimate different populations’ genetic predisposition to common diseases.

At the same time, we are still to uncover the relationship of consanguinity with common yet complex diseases like type-2 diabetes, obesity, and hypertension. They will have to be investigated in greater detail.

One recent study, published on September 26 this year  in the journal Cell, suggested that consanguinity could increase the risk and the rate of diseases like type-2 diabetes.

In the coming years, advances in genomics research indicate that we can expect innovative solutions to mitigate the risks associated with consanguinity on genetic diseases. This in turn could usher in a future where personalised medicine, genetic diagnostics, and genetic counselling can play a pivotal role in improving the health outcomes of affected individuals and their families.

The authors are senior consultants at the Vishwanath Cancer Care Foundation.



Source link

]]>
Genomic clues suggest humans’ ancestors nearly went extinct 9L years ago https://artifexnews.net/article67338304-ece/ Sun, 24 Sep 2023 05:00:00 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article67338304-ece/ Read More “Genomic clues suggest humans’ ancestors nearly went extinct 9L years ago” »

]]>

The human population on the earth exceeded eight billion people in November 2022, underscoring our species’ status as the dominant force on our planet, with our unparalleled cognitive abilities and technological prowess, and ability to harness, engineer, and reshape the environment around us.

This dominance has also resulted in some catastrophic outcomes as we have expanded our footprint, resulting in habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change, pushing a number of species to the brink of extinction. It is hard to imagine that we as a species, just like other animals and plants, could have also been pushed to the brink of extinction at multiple points in the entire history of evolution.

Think about a scenario where the whole human species is represented by a few members only, living in a very hostile natural environment where everyday existence is at the mercy of natural forces. This small group, in addition to its extraordinary resilience and creative survival tactics, would have had the enormous responsibility of keeping the entire human species alive. It’s quite possible that our ancestors could have experienced many such species-defining moments on their path to dominating the world as we know it today.

Researchers have been interested in understanding the evolution and history of the human species, and genome sequences have proved to be of tremendous help. Together with evidence like fossils, researchers have been able to piece together parts of human evolution and history in astonishing detail. However, ancient DNA is limited by the timeline: it can offer only recent insights into human evolution; DNA older than that is seldom preserved intact.

Molecular clock

Our ability to sequence human genomes so quickly and computational tools to analyse the data has allowed us a near-pristine view of the past. This is because genome sequences offer a sort of a snapshot of the molecular clock of human evolution. The genome accumulates genetic variations at a constant rate; the recombination and exchange of genetic material also occur at the time of generation of gametes (sperm and ovum).

There have also been insights from the sequences of the mitochondria and the Y chromosome, which are passed on matrilineally and patrilineally, respectively.

Taken together, scientists have developed several computational approaches to piece together how humans evolved, and have been able to extend them to timescales far beyond those afforded by ancient DNA. They have thus been able to identify population bottlenecks and founder events as well as determine the age of many genetic diseases.

For example, in a March 2018 paper, researchers concluded that sickle cell anaemia arose around 7,300 years ago by studying genome sequences from present-day populations.

Bottlenecks and founders

Scientists have also uncovered population bottlenecks in human history. A bottleneck is when a population becomes constricted to a small number of individuals. When they start a new population, their genomic contributions become more pronounced in that sub-population, and are further amplified in subsequent generations, leading to the founder effect.

In the context of genomic sequences, this would manifest as more shared genetic material between individuals of the population. Founder effects arise from population bottlenecks and also due to other factors, including migration, geographic isolation, and even cultural and marriage practices, such as endogamy and consanguinity.

From a biomedical perspective, founder effects and populations could also confer specific diseases and traits, common and shared between members, at a higher frequency than their prevalence in the general population.

The Ashkenazi Jews are one of the most well-studied founder populations, with a bottleneck event suggesting that a small group of around a thousand-odd individuals gave rise to the modern population. So these individuals have a greater frequency of some genetic diseases due to the founder effect.

Similarly, unique matrimonial practices in India have created around 4,000 endogamous groups, many of whom have strong founder effects. Researchers at the CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology analysed genomic data for Indian populations. In a paper in Nature Genetics, they suggested that many endogamous populations have shared stretches of genomes – more often than do the Ashkenazi Jews – after years of inbreeding.

Almost extinct

In a recent paper in Science, researchers from China used a new computational technique to analyse about 3,000 present-day human genomes from 10 African and 40 non-African  populations. They concluded that the modern human population likely originated only from about 1,200 founding ancestors.

The finding challenges previous estimates that predicted this number to be about 100,000. The scientists also found that our ancestors went through this bottleneck about 900,000 years ago and that the drastic reduction lasted for over 100,000 years.

To compare, modern humans are only around 300,000 years old, meaning our early hominid ancestors were almost extinct for a long time.

This super-bottleneck in human evolution coincided with drastic changes in climate, including prolonged periods of glaciation and droughts that could have killed off many other species, diminishing food sources our ancestors. The recovery of the human population from the super-bottleneck could’ve been due to development of more hospitable environmental conditions, the control of fire, and, eventually, some form of agriculture practice.

The small number of breeding individuals over a long time would also have had severe consequences for the genetic diversity of humans, and likely shaped humanity in ways we don’t yet know.

Delving into the secrets of our ancestors using genomic analysis is like peering through a time-travelling telescope, discovering profound insights into the future of our species. By decoding the genetic blueprints of our forebears, we gain a deeper understanding of the genetic innovations that allowed us to become the dominant species on the earth.

This is also a roadmap for what lies ahead: as we confront challenges like climate change and infectious diseases, the lessons from our ancestors’ survival can become invaluable.

The authors are senior consultants at the Vishwanath Cancer Care Foundation.



Source link

]]>