electoral bonds – Artifex.News https://artifexnews.net Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:30:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 https://artifexnews.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/cropped-Artifex-Round-32x32.png electoral bonds – Artifex.News https://artifexnews.net 32 32 Electoral bonds data: 20 firms bought electoral bonds within 3 years of incorporation, despite 3-year rule https://artifexnews.net/article68047917-ece/ Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:30:00 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article68047917-ece/ Read More “Electoral bonds data: 20 firms bought electoral bonds within 3 years of incorporation, despite 3-year rule” »

]]>

Twelve of the 20 new companies which bought electoral bonds were from Hyderabad.
| Photo Credit: Akash Dhage/Unsplash

Despite companies in existence for less than three years not being allowed to make political contributions — even through the electoral bonds route — data shows that at least 20 such newly incorporated firms purchased poll bonds worth about ₹103 crore (Table 1).

At the time when they purchased their first electoral bonds, five of these firms were in existence for less than a year, seven of them were a year old and the eight others had only completed two years. Notably, many of these firms were started in 2019 when the Indian economy went through recession or during the middle of the pandemic and bought electoral bonds worth crores of rupees just months after incorporation.


Also read: Electoral bonds data | Full list of donors and recipient political parties

The ban on companies making political contributions within three years from incorporation has been in existence for nearly four decades. In 1985, the Parliament amended Section 293A, lifting the ban on political contributions by firms subject to a few conditions. One of the conditions was that the firms should not be owned by the government and should not be less than three years old. This clause was retained under Section 182 of the Companies Act, 2013. When Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2017, amended Section 182, just before the introduction of electoral bonds, this clause was again retained. However, the amendment deleted the first proviso by which the amount donated by a company was capped at 7.5% of its average net profit during its previous three financial years. The prohibition on companies making donations to political parties in their first three years continued. According to Section 182 of the Companies Act 2013, if a firm makes a donation in contravention to the provisions, “the company shall be punishable with fine which may extend to five times the amount so contributed and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months and with fine which may extend to five times the amount so contributed”.

Table 1 | The table shows the names of the 20 firms which purchased the electoral bonds (EBs), within three years of their incorporation. The date of incorporation of these companies, the date on which they purchased their first poll bond, the difference between the two dates along with the total worth of bonds purchased by these firms is mentioned in the table. 

Table appears incomplete? Click to remove AMP mode


Also read: Electoral bonds data | 55 firms’ purchase exceeded 7.5% cap in 2022-24, lion’s share went to BJP

12 of these 20 companies were headquartered in Hyderabad (Table 2). Together these 12 companies donated ₹37.5 crores, and close to 75% of which was encashed by the BRS, with the rest divided among the TDP, the Congress and the BJP. Two companies in Hyderabad — Tsharks Infra Developers Private Limited and Tsharks Overseas Education Consultancy Private Limited — both incorporated in 2023 — purchased ₹7.5 crore worth of bonds within months of getting incorporated and donated it to the BRS. Among the rest, HH Iron and Steel Private Limited, headquartered in Coimbatore, gave ₹15 crores to the BJP and five crores to the BJD. Their first electoral bond purchase was done just days short of turning three years old. Askus Logistics Private Limited, incorporated in November 2021, bought its first electoral bond within 1.5 years of its incorporation and donated ₹22 crores. This was encashed by the DMK, AITC and the RJD. Besseggen Infotech LLP, incorporated in May 2018, bought bonds worth ₹11.5 crores, with their first purchase done two years and ten months into their existence.

Table 2 | The table shows the city-wise split of the 20 companies.

Table 3 | The table shows the party-wise split of the encashments of the EBs purchased by the 20 companies.

Electoral bonds data | New firms bought crores of electoral bonds within months of formation

The three-year rule was retained to prevent shell companies from making political contributions. When the first proviso, which prescribed the 7.5% cap, was removed in 2017, the Election Commission of India had warned that this may lead to the use of “black money through shell companies”. The RBI had also flagged the possibility of firms misusing bearer bonds for money laundering.

The list of 20 firms is not exhaustive as it does not include the firms which were newly incorporated after mergers and amalgamations. The list also does not include firms that are not in the MCA

With inputs from Rebecca Rose Varghese


Watch our Data video:Electoral bonds banned: Which party benefitted the most while it existed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=videoseries



Source link

]]>
What Are Electoral Bonds And Why Are They Being Challenged In Court https://artifexnews.net/explained-what-are-electoral-bonds-and-why-are-they-being-challenged-in-court-4530444rand29/ Tue, 31 Oct 2023 06:24:54 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/explained-what-are-electoral-bonds-and-why-are-they-being-challenged-in-court-4530444rand29/ Read More “What Are Electoral Bonds And Why Are They Being Challenged In Court” »

]]>

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court is today hearing a batch of requests challenging the constitutional validity of the electoral bonds scheme, which allows anyone in the country to donate money to political parties anonymously.

A five-judge constitution bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, will look at two important issues: the legality of anonymous donations to political parties and the violation of citizens’ right to information about the funding of political parties.

What Are Electoral Bonds?

Electoral bonds are a financial instrument that allows individuals and businesses to donate money to political parties without declaring it. They were introduced by the BJP government in 2018 as an alternative to cash donations. They were pitched as an initiative to bring transparency in political funding.

According to the provisions of the scheme, electoral bonds may be purchased by any citizen of India or entity incorporated or established in India.

Who Can Buy Electoral Bonds?

When a person or organisation purchases these bonds, they are not required to disclose their identity to the public or the political party receiving the donations.

These bonds are available in multiple denominations, ranging from Rs 1,000 rupees to Rs 1 crore at all branches of the State Bank of India (SBI). These donations are also interest-free.

While the donor’s identity is not publicly disclosed, the government and the bank maintain a record of the purchaser’s details. This information is kept for auditing purposes and to ensure that only legitimate sources of funding are used.

Which Parties Can Receive Funding Through Electoral Bonds?

Only the political parties registered under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and which secured not less than 1 per cent of the votes polled in the last election to the Lok Sabha or a state legislative Assembly are eligible to receive electoral bonds.

According to the notification, electoral bonds shall be encashed by an eligible political party only through an account with an authorised bank.

What Is The Argument Against Electoral Bonds?

The Supreme Court will today be hearing four requests challenging electoral bonds, including those filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur and the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Since the inception of the scheme, it has been a subject of debate with critics questioning if it has actually brought transparency in politics.

The anonymity of donors has led to accusations that it could potentially foster corruption and favoritism in politics. The donor’s identity is not disclosed to the public or the Election Commission, which makes it difficult to track the origin of political contributions.

What Is The Centre’s Stand?

Ahead of the court hearing, Attorney General (AG) R Venkataramani told the court that citizens do not have the right to information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution regarding the source of the funds.

Maintaining that the electoral bonds scheme for funding political parties contributes to clean money, the top law officer has said there can be no general right to know “anything and everything”, without being subjected to reasonable restrictions.

“The scheme in question extends the benefit of confidentiality to the contributor. It ensures and promotes clean money being contributed. It ensures abiding by tax obligations. Thus, it does not fall foul of any existing right,” the AG said in a statement.

Which Party Has Received The Maximum Donations?

The Election Commission data shows that the BJP received more than half of all electoral bonds bought between March 2018 and 2022.

The BJP received Rs 5,270 crore out of a total of Rs 9,208 crore or 57 per cent of all total electoral bonds sold till 2022.

The main opposition Congress party came a distant second, receiving Rs 964 crore or 10 per cent in the same period, while West Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress got Rs 767 crore or 8 per cent of all electoral bonds.



Source link

]]>