Goods and Services Tax – Artifex.News https://artifexnews.net Stay Connected. Stay Informed. Sun, 22 Sep 2024 10:11:37 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 https://artifexnews.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/cropped-Artifex-Round-32x32.png Goods and Services Tax – Artifex.News https://artifexnews.net 32 32 GST Council is looking at rates item by item for rationalisation: Nirmala Sitharaman https://artifexnews.net/article68670309-ece/ Sun, 22 Sep 2024 10:11:37 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article68670309-ece/ Read More “GST Council is looking at rates item by item for rationalisation: Nirmala Sitharaman” »

]]>

Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs in a conversation with The Hindu in Chennai on September 21, 2024
| Photo Credit: Dinesh Krishnan

Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Saturday (September 21, 2024) said the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council is looking at the GST rates, item by item, for rationalisation and the process was being discussed for a long time and delayed due to several factors including the impact of COVID-19.

In an interaction with senior journalists of The Hindu Group of Publications at The Hindu’s head office in Chennai, Ms. Sitharaman, while responding to a question on rationalisation of GST, said: “It has been delayed for a long time and it’s much overdue due to various factors including the impact of COVID-19, election in some States. Now there is the seriousness, saying we need to take this up. The committee [Group of Ministers committee on rate rationalisation] is looking into it item by item.”

On a question related to GST compensation and compensation cess, she said “Everyone knows that the GST compensation cannot continue after June 30, 2022, and that is by law. So paying off the compensation in the first five years after implementation of the GST continued and ended in June 2022. The cess continues to be collected. Whether it has to continue or not and the rate and items on which the cess should be levied is being discussed in the GST Council.”

According to her, “There are some States that want the GST compensation to continue. But, it cannot continue in the very spirit of how it was brought in. It was introduced to make sure that States don’t have any apprehensions about their revenue resources coming down to a drastically low level and that they cannot sustain themselves, after the implementation of the GST regime.”

Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs speaking at The Hindu office in Chennai on September 21, 2024

Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs speaking at The Hindu office in Chennai on September 21, 2024
| Photo Credit:
M. Srinath

Ms. Sitharaman also pointed out that the GST compensation scheme was brought in at a fairly high rate. “No State was growing anywhere near 14%. Everybody who analyses the economy will know it. For instance, Tamil Nadu’s growth rate was around 6.5%, before 2017. The State would have earned around ₹4.23 lakh crore. Whereas, the State had earned ₹5.23 lakh crore, because of the compensation scheme and post that because of the GST. You [the State] are better off today. The wild allegations that come about the GST system will have to be countered with patience. But when it comes from a State government, whose Finance Minister is sitting in the [GST] Council, randomly because it politically suits them, I leave it as such. But it has no logic in it.”

She said the Constitution gives the Union government every right to levy cesses. “Though the money collected through cesses is not shared with the States directly through devolution, it goes for building roads, schools, ports and hospitals. It is perfectly constitutionally legitimate for the Centre to collect cess. It doesn’t go through the devolution which was designed by the Finance Commission, a constitutional body,” she added.



Source link

]]>
Economic Survey 2023-24: GST played remarkable role in reducing logistics cost https://artifexnews.net/article68432220-ece/ Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:53:47 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article68432220-ece/ Read More “Economic Survey 2023-24: GST played remarkable role in reducing logistics cost” »

]]>

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) has played a remarkable role in bringing down the country’s logistics cost, Economic Survey on July 22 said. File
| Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) has played a remarkable role in bringing down the country’s logistics cost, Economic Survey on July 22 said.

The ‘One Nation, One Tax’ regime has ensured that trucks do not have to wait for hours on State borders, which has brought down the travel time by up to 30%.

“This has reduced the logistics cost and increased the average distance trucks travel from 225 km before GST to 300-325 km,” the Economic Survey 2023-24 tabled in Parliament said.

This has been a great value, adding to the ease of doing business and the growth of manufacturing in the country, it added.

The National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) study of December last year has shown that the logistics cost in the economy has declined 0.8 to 0.9 percentage points of GDP between FY14 and FY22.

India’s position in the World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index (LPI) rose from 44th place in 2018 to 38th in 2023 out of 139 countries. This improvement is attributed to reduced logistics costs and better trade facilitation.

With the introduction of cargo tracking, dwell time in the eastern port of Visakhapatnam came down from 32.4 days in 2015 to 5.3 days in 2019. Additionally, the country’s position in international shipments climbed to 22 in 2023 from 44 in 2018 due to its modernisation and digitalisation efforts.

India moved up five places in infrastructure score and four places up to 48 in logistics competence and equality.

India aims to be in the top 25 countries on the LPI by 2030.



Source link

]]>
Should States get special packages outside Finance Commission allocations? https://artifexnews.net/article68392645-ece/ Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:20:30 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article68392645-ece/ Read More “Should States get special packages outside Finance Commission allocations?” »

]]>

In the run-up to the Union Budget, Nitish Kumar and Chandrababu Naidu, the Chief Ministers of Bihar and Andhra Pradesh, respectively, who are in a position to decide the political fate of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government at the Centre, have demanded special financial packages for their respective States. These packages could potentially increase the fiscal burden on the Centre and also on other States. Should States get special packages outside Finance Commission allocations? Arun Kumar and Pinaki Chakraborty discuss the question in a conversation moderated by Prashanth Perumal J. Edited excerpts:


What is the basis on which the Finance Commission determines how much money is allocated to different States? Do you think there is a case for States such as Bihar and Andhra Pradesh to receive funds beyond what is being allocated to them through the Finance Commission?

Arun Kumar: The last Finance Commission had said that States should be given 41% of the divisible tax pool. Within that 41%, what does each State get? For that, there is a formula which is based on income, population, the area, forests and ecology, demographic performance, etc. If we look at the 15th Finance Commission, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in 2020-21 got the largest amount of funds and Karnataka and Kerala saw the largest decrease in the share of funds. So, in other words, the criteria that the Finance Commission use can change the amount of funds going to different States.

Comment | The problem of special packages

Apart from the Finance Commission devolution, which is statutory, how the remaining amount is spent is determined by the Centre, and that is where political determination comes in; States which are closer to the Centre get more funds. Andhra Pradesh and Bihar are part of the NDA and their support is critical to the government. So, I suppose they will be able to draw more funds.

On Special Category Status for Andhra Pradesh| Explained

Pinaki Chakraborty: As far as transfers by the Finance Commission are concerned, the scope for discretion is very limited. Other Central transfers are also determined by certain principles of distribution across States. We can debate those schemes, their designs, etc., but those are certainly not arbitrary. So, that is the overall framework of transfer.

When there is a specific demand by a specific State for higher transfer of resources for a specific purpose, constitutionally there is no bar on giving more money to that State. But generally, it is not done on a large scale because if that becomes the order of the day, fiscal prudence becomes a casualty. So, the possibility of large-scale discretionary transfers is limited.

Also read | Andhra Pradesh is in crisis, needs more than special category status: Chandrababu Naidu

Andhra Pradesh had a major fiscal shock after bifurcation and that was partly offset when the Finance Commission provided revenue deficit grants. Why Andhra Pradesh still requires Central support requires a careful analysis. But Bihar’s case is different. Bihar’s per capita development spending is less than 60% of the all-States average. So, Bihar has a serious fiscal capacity problem. This has not been fully offset by Finance Commission transfers or additional Central transfers.


What is the relationship between additional Central aid and the economic performance of States? Does the allocation of more funds to a certain State boost its long-term economic performance?

Arun Kumar: There are several factors. The public and private sector together determine the development of a State. But with all other things remaining the same, higher allocations from the Centre to a State would boost the growth of that State. The major problem is the issue of governance — how well is the State governed and how well are the resources that are received by the State spent on development. Poorer States tend to have a greater amount of leakage of funds. But more importantly, the credit-deposit ratio of Bihar is much lower than the all-India average. This means that a large part of Bihar’s savings is leaking out of the State to other States. So, even if you allocate more funds from the Centre, the leakage may be greater than the additional resources they get.

Also read | What is the special category status?

Pinaki Chakraborty: If we look at revenue sharing, the part which is not within the purview of the Finance Commission has increased and that is also why we see an increase in centrally sponsored schemes. So, there is a larger political economy question which needs to be discussed. When we talk about resource flow to the richer regions of the country, it is much, much higher than the resource flow to the poorer regions of the country. This cannot be explained by governance differences alone. If there is a problem of resources, where a State is spending only 50% of the all-States average as public expenditure, this can’t just be explained by differences in governance and quality of expenditure. We need to channelise more resources for higher capital investment in the poorer regions of the country for balanced regional development.


By taking away from States the power to tax their citizens, has GST (Goods and Services Tax) exacerbated competition among States to get more funds from the Centre? We also see that there is no longer tax competition between the States after the centralisation of taxation under GST. Is that good or bad?

Pinaki Chakraborty: Because of this race to the bottom among States after liberalisation, States themselves decided to introduce a floor rate for sales tax in 2000-01. GST has resulted in significant loss of fiscal autonomy for the States because the States used to get two-thirds of their revenue from VAT (Value Added Tax). States also cannot set the tax rate, which is a key component of fiscal autonomy. So, there needs to be some flexibility somewhere within the GST structure so that the States don’t feel that they are not able to tax to provide public services. We should discuss what kind of GST flexibility can bring an element of fiscal autonomy without compromising on the fiscal harmonisation across States.

Arun Kumar: GST has damaged federalism because States are very diverse. The problems of Assam are not the same as those of Gujarat. The States have different sources of revenue and expenditure requirements. What we require in India, a very diverse country, is greater decentralisation and it is the only answer to the problems we face. Across the country, greater centralisation that has come in with GST is perhaps not good. What has happened with GST is that it has benefited the organised sector at the expense of the unorganised sector. Even though the unorganised sector has been kept out of GST, the organised sector is the one that has been rising and that is why you see that GST collections have been rising post-pandemic. This decline in the unorganised sector, which is concentrated in the backward States, means that backward States will under-perform. So, GST needs reform. I recommend that the tax be collected at the last point instead of at each intermediate stage, which creates a lot of complications. There is a lot of corruption associated with input credit, there are fake companies, etc. Trucks are stopped by the police and implementing agencies and money is extorted. So, the black economy continues to flourish. We need to collect a lot more from direct taxes and reduce collections from indirect taxes, which are having a negative effect on the backward States as compared to the advanced ones.


We see that States with political weight usually get more funds from the Centre at the cost of other States. So, how fair and objective is Central aid to states? Is there any way to stop politics from influencing how Central funds are allocated to the States?

Arun Kumar: Seventy per cent of the funds that the Centre spends is non-discretionary. But the remaining 30% are discretionary. The allocation of funds by the Centre to the States depends on politics or political considerations. Greater decentralisation and greater autonomy to the States is the only way to change that.

Pinaki Chakraborty: The real problem of discretion is that if the Centre decides to introduce a new scheme and says that 60% of it will be funded by the Centre and 40% will be funded by the States, it is actually tying up State resources. So, we need deliberations at the national level involving all the stakeholders to understand which schemes the Centre should intervene in, and which it should leave to the States. The 14th Finance Commission had given an important framework for this, recommending that the Centre should intervene in schemes where there are large externalities or national priorities involved. But if the Centre wants to run a primary health centre in a remote village, that is not going to help. So, I think this discussion about political alignment is only of marginal importance. What is really discretionary is the Centre’s complete autonomy in deciding which sector and where to spend.

Listen to the conversation in The Hindu Parley podcast

Arun Kumar former professor of economics at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi; Pinaki Chakraborty is Visiting Distinguished Professor, NIPFP



Source link

]]>
GST still far from simple: Arvind Subramanian https://artifexnews.net/article68368143-ece/ Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:31:12 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article68368143-ece/ Read More “GST still far from simple: Arvind Subramanian” »

]]>

Former CEA Arvind Subramanian. File
| Photo Credit: The Hindu

Revenues from the seven-year old Goods and Services Tax (GST) had not lived up to expectations, having attained pre-GST levels only now, and the objective of a ‘Good and Simple Tax’ remains elusive, former Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian averred on Thursday, terming the lack of critical data such as refunds a challenge.

Blaming the poor revenue performance to a “rate-cutting spree” by the GST Council between late 2017 and 2019, the economist said both the Centre and the States were complicit in this. “The focus was on collections, because refunds were not published and we were looking at the wrong number.. had the refunds data been published, we would have been much more careful about rate cuts,” he reckoned.

“In February, the government started releasing net GST collection numbers and has now stopped publishing it again. Because we are not getting refunds data, we are under the impression that revenues are doing very well,” Mr. Subramanian said at a seminar on seven years of GST hosted by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress.

Terming the multiple cess rates and the GST rate structure ‘monstrous’, Mr. Subramanian mooted the need to try and simplify the GST rates as much as possible. “You should just have one cess rate, one standard rate and one low rate,” he stressed.

Pointing to tweaks and changes effected in the GST regime every time the GST Council meets, the former CEA said this practice was taking the system in a backward direction in terms of simplicity and rationalisation. In 2015, he had recommended a GST regime with three rates — one rate for essential goods, a standard 18% rate, and a 40% levy for demerit goods.

Mr. Subramanian also said he no longer believed it was a good idea to include items like electricity, petroleum and alcohol in the GST net, something that industry and economists like him had been advocating for years.

“I now believe that would be a bad idea… especially in the current context of the acrimonious relations between the Centre and the States, I don’t think it’s politically advisable to expect or ask the States to give up more sovereignty. They have compromised [for GST’s launch before 2017] but other conditions have changed too much for the compromise to be relevant again,” he said.



Source link

]]>
Next government must urgently fix ‘unnecessarily complex’, counter-productive GST: 13th Finance Commission chair https://artifexnews.net/article68039736-ece/ Sun, 07 Apr 2024 14:44:41 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article68039736-ece/ Read More “Next government must urgently fix ‘unnecessarily complex’, counter-productive GST: 13th Finance Commission chair” »

]]>

Thirteenth Finance Commission chairman Vijay Kelkar present virtually at the TIOL Fiscal Award event.
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

A key architect of India’s tax reforms and the chairman of the Thirteenth Finance Commission Vijay Kelkar has called upon the country’s next government to undertake urgent reforms in the “unnecessarily complex” Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, such as switching to a single tax rate of 12% and sharing revenues with local governments and municipal corporations.

Mr. Kelkar has also mooted the creation of an independent secretariat for the GST Council, the apex-decision making body for the indirect tax rolled out in July 2017, as the current arrangement of the Union Government driving the secretariat may be considered problematic by States.

He termed the simplification of the GST structure, which has a “plethora of rates” and a compensation cess on some goods, as a “critically important fiscal reform” to take the GST regime to its most natural destination. Setting the tax rates “largely with the objective to maintain revenue neutrality”, as done by India, is “counter-productive”, Mr. Kelkar argued.

Single GST rate needed

“The genesis of the current GST frauds lies in the very structure of the GST rates, as high rates of GST make it lucrative for the fraudsters to evade taxes,” he stressed after receiving the TIOL Fiscal Award late Saturday. Instead, he suggested that a single GST rate of 12%, with revenues shared equally with all the tiers of the government and Union Territories, be introduced at the earliest.

“In most of the developed and emerging market economies as well, there is a policy of single GST or VAT [Value Added Tax] rate on goods and services. The countries having a single rate and simple GST or VAT laws have been successful in optimising tax revenue and minimising tax disputes,” the former Finance Secretary noted. Of countries with GST or VAT systems, 80% have opted for a single tax rate, including Singapore, New Zealand, the United Arab Emirates, and Japan.

Stating that a single GST rate is “an unmet goal” in India, he recalled that a single rate of 12% had been recommended by the 13th Finance Commission “very early on in the GST debate”. It would simplify the structure, quell almost all classification issues, and help promote manufacturing and exports, he said.

“The age-old tax policy of having a differential tax rate for ‘must have’ and ‘nice to have’ goods and services should be done away with. The revolutionary reform of introduction of a single GST rate, with additional non-VAT-able taxes such as carbon taxes on a few demerit goods like hydrocarbons, is now essential,” Mr. Kelkar asserted.

‘Share GST with local bodies’

While the Union Finance Ministry providing support to the GST Council during its formative decade is “understandable”, Mr. Kelkar cautioned that it is possible that State Governments, who are also members of the GST Council with equal rights, may not always feel that the present administrative arrangement is neutral and unbiased in terms of its support or the advice it offers to the GST Council.

The veteran economist also pleaded for GST revenues to be shared with the third tier of the government created by the 73rd and 74th Amendments to the Constitution.

“Unfortunately, our urban local bodies are woefully short of the needed fiscal base to undertake investments for vital infrastructure and for the supplies of needed high quality public goods. Equitable sharing of the GST with the third tier will go a long way in strengthening the fiscal base of our urban governments and also to deepen democracy and governance at the grass root level,” Mr. Kelkar said, noting that this is prevalent in vibrant democracies across the world.

“To enable this, we will require a Constitutional amendment, firstly to create the consolidated fund for the third tier of government; and secondly, GST reforms, where GST will be shared equitably by the Centre, State, and the local governments such as municipal corporations. This is only fair and appropriate, as GST is a consumption tax and taxpayers should see direct benefits accruing from their payment of the taxes,” he underlined. Such an arrangement, he noted, would also bolster the quality of governance provided by local governments as citizens’ demand for quality public goods will grow louder.



Source link

]]>
GST collections rise 13% to ₹1.72 lakh crore in October https://artifexnews.net/article67484249-ece/ Wed, 01 Nov 2023 09:38:15 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article67484249-ece/ Read More “GST collections rise 13% to ₹1.72 lakh crore in October” »

]]>

An Indian consumer goods trader shows letters GST representing “Goods and Services Tax” (GST)at his shop in Hyderabad on August 3, 2016. Growth in India’s gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) revenues bounced back in October with tax collections rising 13.4% to the second-highest monthly tally of ₹1.72 lakh crore.
| Photo Credit: AFP

Growth in India’s gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) revenues bounced back in October with tax collections rising 13.4% to the second-highest monthly tally of ₹1.72 lakh crore.

October’s revenue growth marks the sharpest year-on-year uptick since December 2022. In September, the growth in the indirect tax collections had slowed to a 27-month low of 10.2%. Domestic transactions and services imports yielded a 13% uptick in October’s kitty. The Finance Ministry did not disclose the revenue growth from goods imports.

GST Compensation Cess collections hit a record high of ₹12,456 crore in October, surging past the previous high of ₹12,025 crore collected in April this year from the levy that will persist till at least March 2026.

Back-of-the-envelope calculations by The Hindu indicate that GST levies on imports of goods rose 13.9% in October, which is faster than the growth from domestic transactions.

The highest-ever revenue from GST was recorded in April 2023 at ₹1.87 lakh crore.

The average gross monthly GST collection in the FY 2023-24 now stands at ₹1.66 lakh crore, 11% higher than the year-ago period.

With inputs from PTI.



Source link

]]>
Congress Says Centre Charging 18% GST On Gangajal, Tax Body Refutes Claim https://artifexnews.net/congress-says-centre-charging-18-gst-on-gangajal-tax-body-refutes-claim-4475260rand29/ Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:58:19 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/congress-says-centre-charging-18-gst-on-gangajal-tax-body-refutes-claim-4475260rand29/ Read More “Congress Says Centre Charging 18% GST On Gangajal, Tax Body Refutes Claim” »

]]>

The puja items are exempt from GST since 2017, said tax body. (Representative Pic)

New Delhi:

The Congress on Thursday accused the Narendra Modi government of imposing an 18 per cent GST on the water of the holy Ganga river and termed it the height of “loot and hypocrisy”. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, however, dismissed the Congress claim and said no such tax has been imposed on Gangajal, used in puja and other ceremonies.

With Prime Minister Narendra Modi undertaking a day-long visit to Uttarakhand on Thursday, the Congress also asked when will he visit the violence-hit Manipur.

“Modi ji, the importance of Mother Ganga, the provider of salvation, is very high for a common Indian from birth till the end of their life. It is good that you are in Uttarakhand today, but your government has imposed 18 per cent GST on the holy Ganga water itself,” Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said in a post in Hindi on X.

“Not even once did you think what would be the burden on those who order Ganga water to be kept in their homes. This is the height of loot and hypocrisy of your government,” he also said.

The Congress also put out an animated video on the situation in the ethnic violence-hit Manipur on its social media handle and said, “The country is asking – when will PM Modi go to Manipur.”

In a clarification, the CBIC said there was no GST (Goods and Services Tax) on Gangajal.

“Gangajal is used in pooja by households across the country and puja samagri is exempt under GST… All these items have been exempt since the introduction of GST,” the CBIC said in a post on X.

The CBIC said that GST on ‘puja samagri’ was discussed in detail in the 14th and 15th meetings of the GST Council held on May 18-19, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively and it was decided to keep them in the exempt list. 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

]]>
Centre Launches GST Reward Scheme In 6 States And Union Territories https://artifexnews.net/centre-launches-gst-reward-scheme-in-6-states-and-union-territories-4348435/ Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:34:43 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/centre-launches-gst-reward-scheme-in-6-states-and-union-territories-4348435/ Read More “Centre Launches GST Reward Scheme In 6 States And Union Territories” »

]]>

Centre and states has kept Rs 30-crore corpus for this fiscal for the GST reward scheme.

Gurugram:

The GST lucky draw ‘Mera Bill Mera Adhikar’ scheme was launched in six states and Union Territories on Friday and the Centre and states have set aside a Rs 30-crore corpus for this fiscal for the reward scheme.

Haryana Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala said the mobile app for the scheme has been downloaded by over 50,000 people so far.

Revenue Secretary Sanjay Malhotra said the ‘Mera Bill Mera Adhikar’ GST lucky draw is being launched on a pilot basis in six states and the prize money will be contributed equally by the Centre as well as states.

“GST has benefitted citizens, customers and governments. Revenues are increasing every month and Centre and states have come together to ensure that tax rates comes down under GST,” Malhotra said.

As against 15 per cent revenue neutral rate as envisioned before GST launch, the average GST rate today is 12 per cent, he said.

The average GST collection every month this fiscal has been Rs 1.60 lakh crore.

The government on Friday launched the Mera Bill Mera Adhikar scheme on a pilot basis on September 1 in Assam, Gujarat & Haryana and UTs of Puducherry, Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu.

Every Month there will be 810 lucky draws. Every quarter there will be 2 bumper lucky draws.

The monthly draws include 800 lucky draws of GST invoices of prize value of Rs 10,000 each and 10 draws with prize of Rs 10 lakh each.

Every quarter the bumper draw would be Rs 1 crore each.

“People should know that GST invoice is their right, it is required for after sales service, and to make people aware we have launched this scheme,” Malhotra said.

Waiting for response to load…



Source link

]]>
GST revenues register three-month high in July https://artifexnews.net/article67145849-ece/ Tue, 01 Aug 2023 10:49:48 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article67145849-ece/ Read More “GST revenues register three-month high in July” »

]]>

Image used for representational purposes only.
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

India’s gross revenues from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) hit a three-month high to cross ₹1.65 lakh crore in July. However, at 10.8%, it was the slowest uptick in collections since July 2021 compared to revenues from the same month last year.

Revenues from domestic transactions and services imports grew 15% in July, which marked the fifth occasion that GST revenues have crossed the ₹1.6-lakh-crore mark during a month. Sequentially, July’s collections, for transactions undertaken in June, were 2.2% higher than the previous month’s GST kitty.

The Finance Ministry did not disclose the trend for GST collections on import of goods, but back-of-the-envelope calculations indicate that there was a 0.8% decline in July from a year ago. Integrated GST collections on goods imports dropped by 0.43% to ₹41,239 crore, while GST Compensation Cess levies on goods imports dropped 15.6% to ₹840 crore.

Overall GST Compensation Cess levies, which will continue till at least March 2026 to repay market borrowings made amid the pandemic to compensate States, grew 7.9% in July to touch nearly ₹11,780 crore.

Central GST or CGST collections in July stood at ₹29,773 crore, while State GST (SGST) yielded ₹37,623 crore. The total IGST collection came to ₹85,930 crore, with around 52% of that revenue coming from domestic transactions.

The Hindu Editorial | Reset time: On GST revenue growth

“The government has settled ₹39,785 crore to CGST and ₹33,188 crore to SGST from IGST. The total revenue of the Centre and the States in the month of July 2023 after regular settlement is ₹69,558 crore for CGST and ₹70,811 crore for the SGST,” the Finance Ministry said.

While overall domestic revenues grew 15%, as many as 18 States recorded 15% or higher growth, while 11 States grew at a slower pace. 

Strife-torn Manipur was the only State to record a contraction, with a 7% drop in revenues. However, the north-eastern States of Mizoram (47%), Meghalaya (27%), Sikkim (26%), recorded the highest growth in revenues, followed by Delhi (25%), Uttar Pradesh (24%) and Tripura (23%).

At the other end of the spectrum, Nagaland, with a 3% rise in revenues, Chhattisgarh with 4%, and Andhra Pradesh (5%) saw the weakest growth, followed by Gujarat and Telangana, both of which clocked a 7% growth.

The Hindu Editorial | An incomplete reform: on six years of the Goods and Services Tax  

“The past trend of six key States generating almost 60% of the nationwide GST collections continues in the current month as well,” noted MS Mani, partner at Deloitte India, adding that compliance drives from the Revenue department were yielding results with steady revenue trends.

The ₹1.6-lakh-crore monthly collection mark may be the new norm for GST revenues, said Abhishek Jain, partner and national head for indirect tax at KPMG, who said revenues might rise further with the upcoming festival season and the approaching “normal period of limitation” for 2017-18 assessments.

Mandatory e-invoicing for all firms with a turnover of ₹5 crore, which kicks in this month, is also expected to bolster revenues, though it may pose some transition challenges for smaller businesses.

“Smaller taxpayers may have trouble embracing the new compliance paradigm, but it would ultimately expedite operations, improve transparency, and encourage more transactions with larger businesses, despite the transition’s potential difficulties,” said Saloni Roy, partner at Deloitte India. 



Source link

]]>
Centre devolves ₹3.09 lakh crore to States till July https://artifexnews.net/article67119814-ece/ Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:13:46 +0000 https://artifexnews.net/article67119814-ece/ Read More “Centre devolves ₹3.09 lakh crore to States till July” »

]]>

The 15th Finance Commission has recommended that States be given 41% of the divisible tax pool of the Centre. File.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

The Centre has devolved over ₹3.09 lakh crore to States till July of the ₹10.21 lakh crore budgeted to be transferred in the current fiscal, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said on July 25.

“Out of ₹10.21 lakh crore estimated to be transferred to States for the FY 2023-24, ₹3,09,521.22 crore has been devolved till July 2023, in 4 instalments having double the normal amount in June’23 for FY 2023-24. There is no pendency on part of devolution payable to States…,” Mr. Chaudhary said in the Lok Sabha.

Of the ₹3.09 lakh crore net proceeds of shareable union taxes and duties distributed to the States, Central GST collection devolution stood at ₹94,368 crore till July.

“Part of the CGST collected and credited to the Consolidated Fund of India is devolved to the States as per the accepted recommendations of the Finance Commission. The total amount of such CGST devolution released to states during FY 2022-23 was $2,68,334.19 crore; this was released in 14 instalments,” the minister said.

The 15th Finance Commission has recommended that States be given 41% of the divisible tax pool of the Centre during the period 2021-22 to 2025-26, which is at the same level as was recommended by the 14th Finance Commission.

In reply to a separate question, Chaudhary said Goods and Services Tax (GST) has decreased the number of taxes and overall tax burden while significantly increasing transparency.

“It has resulted in the significant increase in the number of registered taxpayers. Before the GST regime, the number of registered taxpayers was around 54 lakhs, which has now increased to around 1.46 crore after the GST regime,” he said.



Source link

]]>